Atlas species information
Introduction
Detailed species information from your search of the Atlas.- Scientific name:
- Leiopelma pakeka
- Common name:
- Maud Island frog
- Naming authority:
- Bell et al., 1998
- Bio status category:
- Indigenous (Endemic)
- IUCN threat status:
- Vulnerable
- NZ threat classification:
- Nationally Vulnerable
Refer to www.doc.govt.nz/nztcs for NZ threat classification system details.
Habitat
- Coastal forest, shelters beneath rocks and logs.
- Nocturnal.
- Eggs layed on damp soil beneath rocks or logs and guarded by male; development terrestrial, tadpoles and froglets may cling to males back until metamorphosis completed.
Description
- Light fawn to dark brown, or juveniles sometimes greenish, with varying amounts of dark blotching.
- No bright markings on thighs.
- Measures up to 49 mm from snout tip to vent.
- The skin is generally smooth, though some scattered tubercles (small knob-like projections on the skin) occur on the proximal (upper) portions of the thighs and shanks, and some individuals are more warty on their backs than others.
Distribution
- Maud and Motuara Islands.
Notes
- The scientific name is from Te Pakeka, the name that the Ngati Kuia tribe gave to Maud Island, before it was given the modern Maori name of Te Hoiere.
- Lifespan may exceed 30 years.
- Subfossil bones attributable to the Leiopelma hamiltoni species complex have been found in the Waitomo, Hawkes Bay, Wairarapa and north-west Nelson areas, suggesting that some or all of the members of this group were formerly more widely distributed.
- Maud has around 20,000 individuals, and an additional population established on Motuara Island from a translocation of 300 individuals in 1998; one hundred frogs moved to Long Island in June 2005.
- Initially described as a species separate from Hamilton's frog on basis of allozyme (enzyme/DNA) data, and multivariate analysis of morphometric (size and shape) data; subsequent studies of mitochondrial DNA suggest the population is not as distinctive as was first thought; further research needed.
- Notes about NZ threat classification (Hitchmough, et al 2007): Maud Island: could decline rapidly if chytrid fungus reaches the area.
- Notes about 2008-10 cycle of NZ threat classification for Frogs (Newman et al 2010): Qualifier 'CD' - island biosecurity, translocated Boat Bay and Motuara populations established but Motuara not yet shown to be increasing, Long Island and Karori populations not showing such promising signs.
- Notes about 2012-14 cycle of NZ threat classification for Frogs: (Newman, et al.
- 2013): Varying success of translocation - Long Island probably unsuccessful; Zealandia - survival and probable breeding, but not yet established; Motuara successful.
Statistical information and distribution map
Before 1988 | Since 1988 | |
---|---|---|
Dead Specimen | 1 | 0 |
Bone | 3 | 0 |
Total | 4 | 0 |
Live or dead specimen or shed skin
Bone or fossil